Steve Moss – District 10

Name: Steve Moss

Age: 49

Occupation: Environmental nonprofit director/educator

District: 10

URL for website: www.mossfordistrict10.com

Neighborhood You Live In: Potrero Hill

Date Questionnaire Returned: August 31, 2010

1. How often do you rely on Muni to get you around town? If not, what do you use instead? What would make it easier for you to choose Muni over other forms of transportation?

Before I launched my campaign, I used MUNI several times a week, mostly to get downtown or to City Hall. Given the time pressures of campaigning, as well as inadequate public transport service coverage, I currently tend to rely on my car. It would be easier to choose Muni if San Francisco moved towards developing an information system matched with a diversity of transport modes – from shared cars, shared taxis, vans, buses, and biking – that increases access and improves transit’s overall experience and effectiveness. We should be able to step out of our homes and workplaces, and know that we can get where we want to go in a pre-estimated length of time, using whatever mix of public transport systems are most suitable for the journey.

2. What are the primary concerns of Muni’s owners (aka riders) about transportation and Muni in your District?

In the case of the bus system, there’s inadequate access. Buses stop short of key nodes, or require steep climbs uphill. In the case of the T-line, there are concerns about its reliability and safety.

3. As a Supervisor, you will serve on the Board of the San Francisco County Transportation Authority. What is the role of the SFCTA, and what would you set as priorities for the agency in the next 4 years?

The San Francisco County Transportation Authority administers and oversees the delivery of the Proposition K (Prop K) half-cent local transportation sales tax program and New Expenditure Plan, which was passed by 75% of San Francisco voters in November 2003. The Authority was created in 1989 to administer Prop K’s predecessor, the Proposition B half-cent transportation sales tax program, which began in 1990 and continued until it was superseded by Prop K.

4. Difficult decisions often have to be made regarding transportation in San Francisco. Sometimes a well-researched project may have loud, angry opponents, or a popular project may not be the best for City residents and for San Francisco’s transportation infrastructure. How would you make a decision under these kinds of circumstances?

(Feel free to cite a similar situation from your past experience as an example – it doesn’t have to be transit related)

This situation happens with all issues, all of the time in San Francisco. As an energy and environmental advocate, I’ve repeatedly taken the analytically-supportable path instead of the way advocated by the loudest interest group. Compromises always have to be made, but with a quarter-century experience as a policy analyst and advocate, I’m well used to having to stand up for the options supported by the facts.

5. What is the Fix Muni Now charter amendment? Do you support it? (Y/N) Why or why not?

I support Fix Muni Now as an appropriate policy to enable the City to better negotiate with MUNI drivers.

6. One (of many) causes for Muni’s perennial budget woes was the illegal seizure of state gas tax money by Governor Schwarzenegger and the Legislature. This has left a large hole in Muni’s income (as well as every transit agency in CA).

How would you make up this gap in Muni revenue? Would you support

– a local funding source or sources (fees, taxes, or other type of revenue) to avoid future problems caused by the state?

– would you achieve savings through cuts to Muni’s budget, fare increases, etc.

– or, do you have other ideas on how to get Muni out of its annual financial woes?

(You can choose more than one option, but just explain it clearly)

There’s no easy solution to increasing MUNI revenues. One approach would be to examine which of MUNI’s lines are in high demand, and to focus on improving service quality on those lines, with concomitant rate increases. Lines that are less “profitable” could be replaced with lower-cost transportation modes, such as shuttles, shared taxis, and the like.

Another possibility is to develop partnerships with other entities that are providing transport services (e.g., Super Shuttle; Bauer), to create a more effective, high-quality system that merits higher prices. In either case equity issues need to be considered related to price hikes.

Like other issue areas, I’d consult with MUNI riders for advice on how best to address this challenge.

7. Finally, tell us a story about a funny or unique experience you’ve had on Muni.

During this year’s Chinese New Year festivities my family and I arranged to meet another family at one of the Church Street stops on the J-Line. We found them as planned, and at virtually every stop along the way other families we knew got on the train. Soon our car was a rolling party of family friends on their way to the parade.

Posted in District 10 Candidates | Comments Off on Steve Moss – District 10

Dean Clark – District 6

Dean Clark District 6

Dean Clark - District 6

Name: Dean Clark

Age: 44
Occupation: Teacher/Business Owner
District: 6
Neighborhood You Live In: Hayes Valley
Date Questionnaire Returned: August 29, 2010
1. How often do you rely on Muni to get you around town? If not, what do you use instead? What would make it easier for you to choose Muni over other forms of transportation?

I use Muni about 25 percent of the time. If the availability and safety were not such an issue, I would consider using Muni more than I do. Most of the times I have used Muni, the drivers have been other than nice, and non supportive when an issue arises. I would consider using Muni more if I felt much safer using the bus, and the experience would be a clean bus and safe ride. Though I have my own concerns and experiences with Muni, Many people have told me that Muni is doing a good job and they rely on it more than I do.
2. What are the primary concerns of Muni’s owners (aka riders) about transportation and Muni in your District?

I believe the primary concerns include reliability, cut backs (lack of buses), and security. We all need to work with Muni during these difficult times of restructuring; however we all need to be able to get to work! I think one of the other concerns of Muni drivers is where is the money going?
3. As a Supervisor, you will serve on the Board of the San Francisco County
Transportation Authority. What is the role of the SFCTA, and what would you set as priorities for the agency in the next 4 years?

The SFCTA should continue to work on making the city friendlier to bikes by adding additional safety bike lanes. The main focus should be for improving our streets and sidewalks to make them better for pedestrians and bicyclists.
4. Difficult decisions often have to be made regarding transportation in San Francisco. Sometimes a well-researched project may have loud, angry opponents, or a popular project may not be the best for City residents and for San Francisco’s transportation infrastructure.

How would you make a decision under these kinds of circumstances?
(Feel free to cite a similar situation from your past experience as an example – it doesn’t have to be transit related)
While working on solutions, I believe we should find middle ground for everyone involved. If a project has loud, angry opponents I would listen to what they have to say and consider their input in the decision process. I think everyone should have a say in what goes on in San Francisco and District 6.
5. What is the Fix Muni Now charter amendment? Do you support it? (Y/N) Why or why not?
I am in favor (yes) to the Fix Muni Now Amendment. We need a functioning system with Muni, people need to get to work and access public transportation in San Francisco. The quality of life of many people in San Francisco is being affected by the Muni system and we need to fix it now. However this will not be the cure all but a start to fix our Muni system.
6. One (of many) causes for Muni’s perennial budget woes was the illegal seizure of state gas tax money by Governor Schwarzenegger and the Legislature. This has left a large hole in Muni’s income (as well as every transit agency in CA).
How would you make up this gap in Muni revenue? Would you support

– a local funding source or sources (fees, taxes, or other type of revenue) to avoid future problems caused by the state?

– would you achieve savings through cuts to Muni’s budget, fare increases, etc.

– or, do you have other ideas on how to get Muni out of its annual financial woes?
(You can choose more than one option, but just explain it clearly)
I support the idea of congestion priced traffic in San Francisco. We have a lot of drivers from outside San Francisco and tourists who drive on our streets and cause a lot of congestion with our traffic. I believe this would help Muni because many would decide to take alternative modes of transportation instead of driving because of cost factors.
I am concerned of the thought of increasing fares because we don’t want to discourage ridership. Plus our elderly and many others are on fixed incomes and it could be financially impossible for some to get to the doctor, and could have an impact on ones quality of life issues here in San Francisco.
7. Finally, tell us a story about a funny or unique experience you’ve had on Muni.
I was on the 30 Stockton bus from the little Italy area going downtown to work. I was late to get to work and we stopped at every stop on the way. I was amazes at the number of people who would rush on the bus through the back door and push and shove to get on, with no regard for public safety. I never took the Stockton bus again.
Posted in District 6 Candidates | Comments Off on Dean Clark – District 6

Harold. “H” Brown – District 6

Name: h. brown
Age:  66
Occupation:  Retired teacher
District:  D-6
E-mail:   h@ludd.net
Neighborhood You Live In:  Tenderloin
Date Questionnaire Returned:  8-26-10
1.How often do you rely on Muni to get you around town? If not, what do you use instead? What would make it easier for you to choose Muni over other forms of transportation?

Muni is my primary transport. I ride it 5 to 10 times weekly counting round trips and I generally am able to keep my trips short enough to use transfers.
Making it an easier choice? Naw, like most riders I seldom have options. If it gets worse I’ll still ride it. I’d like to see permanent onboard security on the most dangerous routes.
2.What are the primary concerns of Muni’s owners (aka riders) about transportation and Muni in your District?

First, security. I don’t think Muni should pay the cops a dime. Until the last 2 years the cops didn’t send bills to Muni. They shouldn’t now. Particularly since they don’t earn the money. They game the Muni budget as do a plethora of departments. I’d rather see Patrol Specials on the coaches.
3.As a Supervisor, you will serve on the Board of the San Francisco County Transportation Authority. What is the role of the SFCTA, and what would you set as priorities for the agency in the next 4 years?

The primary function of the SFTA is to rubber stamp outrageous giveaway construction contracts to friends of the Mayor. Contracts for such projects as the completely useless Chinatown Subway. The supes should be putting measures on the ballot to take control of the MTA.
4. Difficult decisions often have to be made regarding transportation in San Francisco.
Sometimes a well-researched project may have loud, angry opponents, or a popular project may not be the best for City residents and for San Francisco’s transportation
infrastructure.

How would you make a decision under these kinds of circumstances?

(Feel free to cite a similar situation from your past experience as an example – it doesn’t have to be transit related)

‘Lost leaders’ like the cable car system are legitimate. Political pork like Rose Pak’s personal subway are not. The crowd’s never a problem with me. I can yell louder and with more informed anger than anyone in town. Let them yell when I advocate bringing back and extending the jitney system. I’d do that at the rate of a hundred or so privately owned buses a year.
5.What is the Fix Muni Now charter amendment? Do you support it? (Y/N) Why or why not?
Sean’s charter amendment is a public mugging for political purposes. I don’t think the drivers or other employees are overpaid until you take overtime into account.    I asked Elsbernd if he’d be in favor of re-opening the cops’ MOU and he said that he was. That said, I’ll vote for his measure. Some of the provisions of their contract are simply insane. I’ll fight to keep their pay scale competitive but won’t defend coke heads on a binge not required to phone in when they miss work.
6. One (of many) causes for Muni’s perennial budget woes was the illegal seizure of state gas tax money by Governor Schwarzenegger and the Legislature. This has left a large hole in Muni’s income (as well as every transit agency in CA).

How would you make up this gap in Muni revenue? Would you support
– a local funding source or sources (fees, taxes, or other type of revenue) to avoid future problems caused by the state?
– would you achieve savings through cuts to Muni’s budget, fare increases, etc.
– or, do you have other ideas on how to get Muni out of its annual financial woes?
(You can choose more than one option, but just explain it clearly)

Stop paying anything to any other department. Create a tax on sizeable business Downtown to cover the actual cost of getting their workers to them. Again, give contracts for one jitney per applicant up to say, 500 of them. All sizes of apparatus.
7. Finally, tell us a story about a funny or unique experience you’ve had on Muni.

Some guy jumped on the 5 Fulton headed downtown around midnight. There were only a half dozen or so of us riding. He started to curse and then threaten the driver for being late. I’ve no idea if the bus was late. I don’t think I waited over 10 minutes. Finally the guy asks the driver if he wants to get “slapped around”. I stood and called out:   “I’m on the driver’s side. Anyone else?”.
The guy froze (bus was moving all this time) and after a few seconds a huge guy in the back called out: “I’m with the driver too.”. Rest of ride was peaceful.
Posted in District 6 Candidates | Comments Off on Harold. “H” Brown – District 6

Matthew Drake – District 6

Matthew Drake

Matthew Drake - District 6

Name: Matthew Drake

Age: 38
Occupation: I am the general counsel of appMobi
District: 6
Neighborhood You Live In: SOMA
Date Questionnaire Returned:  August 27, 2010
1. How often do you rely on Muni to get you around town? If not, what do you use instead? What would make it easier for you to choose Muni over other forms of transportation?
I live in the middle of SOMA, so I can walk almost everywhere.  I’ll usually bike or take Muni if I’m going somewhere that’s too far to walk.
2. What are the primary concerns of Muni’s owners (aka riders) about transportation and Muni in your District?

As with every district, Muni’s cutbacks have caused problems. Many low income residents of District 6 rely on Muni exclusively, so the service cutbacks hit them particularly hard. Although generally District 6 has good mass transit coverage, some parts of the district are underserved by Muni, in part because people didn’t live here when the Muni lines were created many years ago.
3. As a Supervisor, you will serve on the Board of the San Francisco County
Transportation Authority. What is the role of the SFCTA, and what would you set as priorities for the agency in the next 4 years?

The SFCTA should continue work to improve mass transit and street quality in San Francisco.  The Transbay Terminal is a long term project, but the SFCTA should continue to support it, because high speed rail is the single most important thing California can do to fight global warming in the coming decades. On a smaller scale, I support additional spending on Muni, especially the BRT program, as noted below. Additionally, the SFCTA should continue to support additional bike lanes, especially now that the CEQA lawsuit is past us.
4. Difficult decisions often have to be made regarding transportation in San Francisco. Sometimes a well-researched project may have loud, angry opponents, or a popular project may not be the best for City residents and for San Francisco’s transportation infrastructure. How would you make a decision under these kinds of circumstances?

(Feel free to cite a similar situation from your past experience as an example – it doesn’t have to be transit related)

The obvious example is BRT on Geary Street.  It has some loud opponents, but as noted below I am a strong supporter. We can give everyone a chance to be heard, but at some point we will have to move forward and make potentially unpopular decisions.  We cannot accommodate everyone.
Another example is the Transit Effectiveness Project, the first top down look at Muni’s routes in many years. We need to fully implement the TEP’s recommendations to improve Muni for everyone.
5. What is the Fix Muni Now charter amendment? Do you support it? (Y/N) Why or why not?

Yes.  I’m a strong supporter of Prop. G.  Right now, the Muni operator salaries are not negotiated. I believe that their wages should be subject to the same collective bargaining as almost every other city employee.
The real problem is not with Muni’s high wages, it is with the work rules for the employees. For instance, if an operator does not want to come to work, he or she can just not show up.  There’s no need to notify a supervisor. If we want a functioning system, we need to have reasonable work rules so the department can adequately plan its operations.
6. One (of many) causes for Muni’s perennial budget woes was the illegal seizure of state gas tax money by Governor Schwarzenegger and the Legislature. This has left a large hole in Muni’s income (as well as every transit agency in CA).

How would you make up this gap in Muni revenue? Would you support:

– a local funding source or sources (fees, taxes, or other type of revenue) to avoid future problems caused by the state?
– would you achieve savings through cuts to Muni’s budget, fare increases, etc.
– or, do you have other ideas on how to get Muni out of its annual financial woes?
(You can choose more than one option, but just explain it clearly)
I’m a strong supporter of the Bus Rapid Transit projects, especially BRT on Geary. Faster Muni service would bring in more users, which would provide more fare money for additional service.  As busses move more quickly, drivers complete more runs per shift, so the increase in service would not come at a significantly higher cost.  This is a rare situation where we could provide better service at a lower operating cost.
We have been talking about BRT for many years.  We must not let it be derailed or delayed. It would probably bring in additional revenue to Muni and improve service.
7. Finally, tell us a story about a funny or unique experience you’ve had on Muni.

When I tell people I’m running for office, more than one person out of the blue has said to me that the one thing they want is for their Muni bus not to smell like a toilet when they’re going to work in the morning.  It’s not actually funny; it’s more of a sad commentary of how low expectations are.
Posted in District 6 Candidates | Comments Off on Matthew Drake – District 6